 
                - What is the point in having a
                            mind if you never change it
- Your health and that of your family and
                            friends matters
- Our App can and has changed health outcomes
-
                            We have made FREE what other programmes charge for
- We
                            have merged what low carb Dr's use clinically
- Challenge what you have
                            been taught about food
- Did your Grand Parents eat like
                            that?
- What foods were eaten before the diabesity
                            crisis
- Were "we" slimmer in the early to mid
                            1900's?
- Is modern processed food better than
                            historical
- This site is an information portal and
                            FREE health
                                App
- Learn the health markers you should know - no
                            agenda
- No guesswork.  Route 1 direction to what to
                            eat
- Enough science sprinkled with common sense
-
                            Do you know about glucose, insulin, leptin - you should
- Katie and
                            Moyle Baker want to share food truths
                        
 
                         
                         
                         
                         
                        You've come to the right place. The foods we use for condition management reduces body fat as well. This is because we target insulin, the fat storage hormone. No need to calorie count as we just watch carbohydrates. Excess carbs turn to fat (triglycerides), our method negates this. Look at our meal samples below.
 
                        Do you have a medical condition where you take pills or drugs to alleviate the symptoms - have you noticed you never get cured. Diabetes can be officially reversed and or put into remission using a Low Carb Ketogenic or Carnivore diet, as can many other conditions. Low fat and high carb has been a disaster for 50 years - enough already.
 
                        Optionally put the icing on cake. Let us guide you through some beginner to intermediate workouts. Start with walking. Maybe take our beginner Karate training, featuring a World & European champion. We even have an ex-diabetic powering through a weights session.
 
                        Do you have a medical condition where you take pills or drugs to alleviate the symptoms - have you noticed you never get cured. Diabetes can be officially reversed and or put into remission using a Low Carb Ketogenic or Carnivore diet, as can many other conditions.
The original "classic" Ketogenic
                                        diet was used to manage epilepsy since the 1920's, this means it is one the
                                        longest known formalised diets.  The UK's Epilepsy Society continue promote Ketogenic diets
                                        for those who do not get on with AED's (anti epileptic drugs).  3-4 grams
                                        of fat are set off against 1 gram of carboyhydrates and protein (87 - 90%
                                        fat).  It is not necessary to use these ratios for other conditions, such
                                        as diabetes.  All that is required is to produce measurable ketones, either
                                        via weeing on a stick, breathing into a registering device, or pricking a finger
                                        taking a drop of blood.
As mentioned above, there is no requirement to
                                        stick to a dogma about the ratios.  Our Ketogenic diet consists of a base
                                        of meat, fish, eggs or shell fish, cooked in anyway, but absent of any vegetable
                                        oil (where possible), animal fats such as lard, butter, tallow, duck fat are
                                        fine as is coconut oil, and olive oil for light frying (watch the smoke point
                                        with this oil).  We then add low sugar vegetables and fruit.  Diary is
                                        used if tolerated.  Our meals are not too dissimilar to traditional British
                                        meat and two veg, with a modern twist.  Here are some examples pulled pork greens &
                                            squash, Thai chicken curry, Chinese style duck & vegetables, Greek
                                            yogurt fruit & nuts.  Things can be as simple as sausage /
                                        bacon, tomato and eggs.
The objective of a ketogenic diet is to lower
                                        glucose, which creates an additional fuel source called ketones.  Ketones
                                        are a cleaner fuel than glucose.  Ketones are natural, babies are born in
                                        ketosis.  Modern industrialised high carb eating patterns do not allow
                                        glucose to lower to the point of significant bouts of ketosis; liver and bacon,
                                        meat and two veg, has been replaced by pasta, pizza, chips or breaded fried
                                        chicken.  Something sweet, cereal or bread based is eaten at each
                                        opportunity up to 6 times a day and considered normal, when the previous was a
                                        maximum of 3 (Jason Fung).
The rewards are unbelievable. 
                                        Truly.  Everyone deserves to experience what "we" feel, words cannot
                                        express the power of this natural intervention.  Fat loss, increased
                                        energy, clarity of thought, stable blood sugars, chronic condition potential
                                        reversal or better results than drug treatments (without the side effects).
                                        Animal based Ketogenic diets nourish the body completely meaning that food
                                        satiety is reached quickly.  This in turn is a gateway into fasting as an
                                        option.  Fasting speeds up fat loss and or resolution / relief of whatever
                                        condition present, such as migranes or IBS.  This translates to better work
                                        performance, relationships, quality of life and mood.
Would you like to
                                        turn fat into fuel, no calorie counting.  Enjoy full plates of food. 
                                        Only exercise as an optional extra.  Have no requirement to eat every 4
                                        hours, the majority on a Ketogenic diet eat either one or 2 meals a day - yes
                                        really, with no hunger and even if they are athletic. No requirement to try to
                                        maintain weight with excessive exercise (exercise does however put the icing on
                                        the cake). Naturally reverses being overweight and Type 2 diabetes.  Is the
                                        best way to manages Type 1 diabetes (flat glucose, minimal insulin). The
                                        American Diabetes Association wrote a consensus report which
                                        states:
"Reducing overall carbohydrate intake for individuals
                                                with diabetes has demonstrated the most evidence for improving glycemia
                                                and may be applied in a variety of eating patterns that meet individual
                                                needs and preferences."
Similar to the ADA in
                                        America, the Western Australia government produced a report called the "Food
                                        Fix", with a similar landmark recommendation of the ADA in America to endorse a
                                        low carbohydate diet for Type 2
                                        diabetics https://www.nutritioniq.com.au/post/the-food-fix (report)
That is 2 major authorites stating
                                        that low carbohydrate diets can be used for diabetics.  As up to 1 in 2
                                        persons in the USA have either Type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes and up to 88%
                                        have metabolic syndrome, common sense dictates that at least 50% of a major
                                        population could use a low carbohydrate dietary lifestyle - common
                                        sense?
The Ketogenic lifestyle supports the functions of the liver,
                                        kidneys, pancreas, eyes, circulation, thyroid, brain, nerves, heart, bones and
                                        muscles.
Some never measure anything. 
                                        Carbohydrates can be measured if optimising a condition is a requirement. 
                                        Some guidelines are that 100 grams of carbs a day is classified as a Low Carb
                                        Higher Fat amount around 50 grams is perhaps an amount to initially aim for and
                                        tune from there.  20 to 30 grams essentially guarantees getting into Ketosis.  These three areas are where the
                                        majority stay within.  It is possible to go lower on carbs, with some
                                        opting for zero.  Whilst it is not possible to entirely have zero carbs as
                                        trace amounts some persons either choose to or must do to resolve extremely
                                        chronic conditions such as crohn's disease.
That's right.  In the
                                        mainstream, low carb is often defined as a minimum of 130 grams a day, which is
                                        less than 25% of calories consumed.  50 grams of calories equates to less
                                        than 10% of calories a day from carbohydrates.
Are these lower amounts
                                        safe?  Yes and No.  Yes, In 2005 The National Academies of Sciences said that there are
                                        essential fatty acids and proteins which must be consumed for human life, but
                                        that there are no essential carbohydrates.  This is a technical fact,
                                        however "we" advocate low sugar carbohydrates.  If fats and protein are
                                        present within the diet, the body will convert these into the exact amounts
                                        required for the brain, the rest of the body will use ketones - this is a
                                        natural state that modern eating patterns prevent.
Yes to both. You can decide what works best for you. We are not robots, and we have different ancestral heritage, which does impact the ratios we can tolerate, in a similar manner to risks for Alzheimers or cancer. Women may in general do better with a higher fat ratio to sure up hormones, but this is not universal.
Our meals use whole foods of an animal origin such as all meats, fish and shell fish. In addition low sugar fruit, vegetables and salads. If diary is tolerated this is also included along with nuts and seeds. We remove modern food like products with multiple ingredient and additives, many of which cannot be pronounced.
Absolutely safe and delicious. We've eaten red meat for millennia. The longest living population are from Hong Kong and they eat the most meat. Doesn't this contradict the mainstream push? Yes, in order to sell an alternative, the narrative has to be true, otherwise "fake" foods would be consigned to history. What about the evidence? Review it, the tricks are to use anti-meat testers and studies that do not pass the scientific threshold to prove anything. The contributors to this site believed the mantra, and suffered IBS, fat and diabetes. Katie Baker was trained 3 times in the low fat, high carb, grain based methods as a fitness trainer, sports scientist and a physiotherapist - she would practically assign nutrition in real world scenarios, only to bin the indoctrination in favour of simple food that nature provides as a single ingredient.
Understandable. Here's a common
                                        sense rationale. Indigenous populations such as the Inuit and Maasai eat mostly
                                        meat and do not suffer the same non-communicative diseases of Western societies,
                                        such as diabetes and hypertension. Here are some websites with real people and
                                        their successes on mostly meat based diets:
                                        
- Meatrx 
                                        
- Diabetes.co.uk
                                        
- Diet Doctor
                                        
- We have our own small successes, which we intend to grow.
                                        
                                        
Meat is at the heart of these successes at very close to 100% of the cases.
                                        What about the weight of the evidence? There has never been a study that crosses
                                        the scientific threshold of proof. IARC say eating bacon raises a risk of bowel
                                        cancer to 18% or 51 in 100,000, the standard risk is
                                        43 in 100,000. The statistical gymnastics to have a rise of 8
                                        equate to 18%, is achieved by a method called relative risk. Whist relative risk
                                        is a legitimate measurement "they" know it is misleading. The 8 increase was
                                        gained by asking people what they ate via a food frequency
                                        questionnaire.....enough said, revert back to the section above regarding the
                                        longest lived and what they eat. On these questionnaires, pizza for example is
                                        classed as meat.
                                        
                                        
When it comes to risk, take a fast food meal of burger and chips. They would
                                        say the burger pattie increases risk, whilst hundreds of medical professionals
                                        say the risk is in the rancid vegetable oil, the sugary burger bun and the high
                                        carb fries - we are right, they are wrong.
Food choices have recently
                                        been framed in the "plant based paradigm" which favours commercial products not
                                        whole foods such as carrot or courgettes (always something packaged and mixed
                                        with loads of ingredients).  We prefer history to tell the truth about real
                                        food.  In Britain for example if you have relatives who are around 70 to 90
                                        years old, ask them what they ate as a child.  Review for yourself what
                                        hunter gathers used to eat, and what those who still survive now eat (those not
                                        influenced by Western foods, such as in the Amazon).  The Maasi, Hadza,
                                        Inuit are good examples.  Most have in common a meat and or fish as the
                                        primary must have base of their diets with berries and tubers for subsistence
                                        (check this for yourself).  Below is an example of what the Commanche
                                        indians ate.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanche):
The Comanche
                                        were initially hunter-gatherers. When they lived in the Rocky Mountains, during
                                        their migration to the Great Plains, both men and women shared the
                                        responsibility of gathering and providing food. When the Comanche reached the
                                        plains, hunting came to predominate. Hunting was considered a male activity and
                                        was a principal source of prestige. For meat, the Comanche hunted buffalo, elk,
                                        black bear, pronghorn, and deer. When game was scarce, the men
                                        hunted wild mustangs, sometimes eating their own ponies. In later years the
                                        Comanche raided Texas ranches and stole longhorn cattle. They did not eat fish
                                        or fowl, unless starving, when they would eat virtually any creature they could
                                        catch, including armadillos, skunks, rats, lizards, frogs, and grasshoppers.
                                        Buffalo meat and other game was prepared and cooked by the women. The
                                            women also gathered wild fruits, seeds, nuts, berries, roots, and
                                            tubers — including plums, grapes, juniper berries, persimmons,
                                        mulberries, acorns, pecans, wild onions, radishes, and the fruit of the prickly
                                        pear cactus. The Comanche also acquired maize, dried pumpkin, and tobacco
                                        through trade and raids. Most meats were roasted over a fire or boiled. To boil
                                        fresh or dried meat and vegetables, women dug a pit in the ground, which they
                                        lined with animal skins or buffalo stomach and filled with water to make a kind
                                        of cooking pot. They placed heated stones in the water until it boiled and had
                                        cooked their stew. After they came into contact with the Spanish, the Comanche
                                        traded for copper pots and iron kettles, which made cooking easier.
                                        
                                        
Women used berries and nuts, as well as honey and tallow, to flavor buffalo
                                        meat. They stored the tallow in intestine casings or rawhide pouches called
                                        oyóotû¿. They especially liked to make a sweet mush of buffalo marrow mixed with
                                        crushed mesquite beans.
                                        
                                        
The Comanches sometimes ate raw meat, especially raw liver flavored with
                                        gall. They also drank the milk from the slashed udders of buffalo, deer,
                                            and elk.  Among their delicacies was the curdled milk from the
                                        stomachs of suckling buffalo calves. They also enjoyed buffalo tripe, or
                                        stomachs.
                                        
                                        
Comanche people generally had a light meal in the morning and a large
                                        evening meal. During the day they ate whenever they were hungry or when it was
                                        convenient. Like other Plains Indians, the Comanche were very hospitable people.
                                        They prepared meals whenever a visitor arrived in camp, which led to outsiders'
                                        belief that the Comanches ate at all hours of the day or night. Before calling a
                                        public event, the chief took a morsel of food, held it to the sky, and then
                                        buried it as a peace offering to the Great Spirit. Many families offered thanks
                                        as they sat down to eat their meals in their tipis.
                                        
                                        
Comanche children ate pemmican, but this was primarily a tasty, high-energy
                                        food reserved for war parties. Carried in a parfleche pouch, pemmican was eaten
                                        only when the men did not have time to hunt. Similarly, in camp, people ate
                                        pemmican only when other food was scarce. Traders ate pemmican sliced and dipped
                                        in honey, which they called Indian bread.
This is just one example, far
                                        away from the diets now routinely consumed with the 600,000 choices in modern
                                        supermarkets
                                    
No and yes. No, because we have
                                        modules that assist you with tracking and measuring progress. You can partner
                                        with a buddie or contact a health care professional to monitor and work with
                                        you. The meals have a shopping list and easy to follow recipe or video.
                                        
                                        
The "yes" is due to fast food, sweets, crisps, biscuits and the like being
                                        so tempting and everywhere. It is essential to understand your why for adopting
                                        the programme. Standard dietary lifestyles add fat and increase sickness. 
                                        Others around you may not support your choice accidentally; they will continue
                                        to eat the tempting junk foods.  The junk will still be in the cupboards,
                                        at every fuel station, work.  Your "why" has to be stronger than the
                                        obstacles to success. 
                                    
The best way to not do a life changing ketogenic diet is to mix in the foods and drinks which made you look to dieting in the first place. There are over 600,000 supermarket foods worldwide. Try to picture how many food items there were circa 150 years ago in every society. The modern foods have been designed to hit the "bliss point". Bad fats (vegetable or more accurately labeled seed oils) when mixed with flour and sugar create many of the treats in societies. These are toxic and correlate with many modern diseases.
Cholesterol is in every cell in your
                                        body. Do you believe your body would be trying to harm you? In order for vitamin
                                        D from sunlight to be synthesised, adequate cholesterol within the body is
                                        required. Did you know that more persons die with so called normal cholesterol
                                        than high - where does this fact leave the push to lower cholesterol.
                                        Cholesterol is required for male and female sex hormones. Cholesterol repairs
                                        the body and is required for a strong immune response.  Your brain has 25%
                                        of the cholesterol in your body, is it wise to tamper with our evolutionary
                                        workings on the hypothesis that is still an hypothesis, where the author has
                                        been proved to misrepresented facts.
                                        
The "Diet Heart Hypothesis" was developed in the 1950's by Ancel Keys, this
                                        blamed fat and cholesterol for heart attacks and strokes; whilst there is a
                                        consensus among many in favour of the theory, there is no definitive proof that
                                        cholesterol is a bad actor. Would we say someone should be drained of blood if
                                        they contracted blood cancer?  There are tests which can see heart disease
                                        such as a coronary artery calcium (cac) scan rather than a guess (framingham)
                                        which is current standard of care. When the standard of care equation is
                                        compared to cac results in the same individuals it is embarassing the
                                        difference; we cannot keep giving our populations statins on this
                                        basis.
Advocates of the diet heart hypothesis cannot reconcile that post
                                        menopausal women show significant benefit to having high cholesterol. Everyone,
                                        especially women would do well to read or listen to the "Big Fat Surprise" by Nina Teicholz,
                                        and review the YouTube works of Dave Feldman and David Diamond.
Further reading /
                                        viewing:
Tamara Willner
Dr Jeffrey Gerber
Dr Malcolm Kendrick
Dr Paul
                                            Mason
                                    
You have most likely been eating in
                                        a carbohydrate heavy manner for decades.  Your body expects meals to be
                                        sugary either in the mouth, and or when broken down by digestion. 
                                        Switching to a low carb or ketogenic diet requires the body to build up
                                        mechanisms for digestion.
Eating cereals, fast foods usually with a bread
                                        wrapper, juices and the like are talked of as being "normal" eating.  This
                                        type of diet is the worst as it is designed by men and women is white gowns
                                        whose raison d'être is to tickle the food senses (bliss point), and ensure you
                                        are enticed to buy more.
Our ketodoit programme retrains your taste buds
                                        to an ancestral level.  This reset enables a renewed appreciation of
                                        foods.
Most people take 2 weeks to go from their current eating pattern
                                        to a healthy ketodoit whole food animal based dietary method.  This is a
                                        remarkably short period of time in comparison to years of mixed
                                        eating.  
Absolutely safe and delicious. We've eaten red meat for millennia. The longest living population are from Hong Kong and they eat the most meat. Doesn't this contradict the mainstream push? Yes, in order to sell an alternative, the narrative has to be true, otherwise "fake" foods would be consigned to history. What about the evidence? Review it, the tricks are to use anti-meat testers and studies that do not pass the scientific threshold to prove anything. The contributors to this site believed the mantra, and suffered IBS, fat and diabetes. Katie Baker was trained 3 times in the low fat, high carb, grain based methods as a fitness trainer, sports scientist and a physiotherapist - she would practically assign nutrition in real world scenarios, only to bin the indoctrination in favour of simple food that nature provides as a single ingredient.
Understandable. Here's a common
                                        sense rationale. Indigenous populations such as the Inuit and Maasai eat mostly
                                        meat and do not suffer the same non-communicative diseases of Western societies,
                                        such as diabetes and hypertension. Here are some websites with real people and
                                        their successes on mostly meat based diets:
                                        
- Meatrx 
                                        
- Diabetes.co.uk
                                        
- Diet Doctor
                                        
- We have our own small successes, which we intend to grow.
                                        
                                        
Meat is at the heart of these successes at very close to 100% of the cases.
                                        What about the weight of the evidence? There has never been a study that crosses
                                        the scientific threshold of proof. IARC say eating bacon raises a risk of bowel
                                        cancer to 18% or 51 in 100,000, the standard risk is
                                        43 in 100,000. The statistical gymnastics to have a rise of 8
                                        equate to 18%, is achieved by a method called relative risk. Whist relative risk
                                        is a legitimate measurement "they" know it is misleading. The 8 increase was
                                        gained by asking people what they ate via a food frequency
                                        questionnaire.....enough said, revert back to the section above regarding the
                                        longest lived and what they eat. On these questionnaires, pizza for example is
                                        classed as meat.
                                        
                                        
When it comes to risk, take a fast food meal of burger and chips. They would
                                        say the burger pattie increases risk, whilst hundreds of medical professionals
                                        say the risk is in the rancid vegetable oil, the sugary burger bun and the high
                                        carb fries - we are right, they are wrong.
Food choices have recently
                                        been framed in the "plant based paradigm" which favours commercial products not
                                        whole foods such as carrot or courgettes (always something packaged and mixed
                                        with loads of ingredients).  We prefer history to tell the truth about real
                                        food.  In Britain for example if you have relatives who are around 70 to 90
                                        years old, ask them what they ate as a child.  Review for yourself what
                                        hunter gathers used to eat, and what those who still survive now eat (those not
                                        influenced by Western foods, such as in the Amazon).  The Maasi, Hadza,
                                        Inuit are good examples.  Most have in common a meat and or fish as the
                                        primary must have base of their diets with berries and tubers for subsistence
                                        (check this for yourself).  Below is an example of what the Commanche
                                        indians ate.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanche):
The Comanche
                                        were initially hunter-gatherers. When they lived in the Rocky Mountains, during
                                        their migration to the Great Plains, both men and women shared the
                                        responsibility of gathering and providing food. When the Comanche reached the
                                        plains, hunting came to predominate. Hunting was considered a male activity and
                                        was a principal source of prestige. For meat, the Comanche hunted buffalo, elk,
                                        black bear, pronghorn, and deer. When game was scarce, the men
                                        hunted wild mustangs, sometimes eating their own ponies. In later years the
                                        Comanche raided Texas ranches and stole longhorn cattle. They did not eat fish
                                        or fowl, unless starving, when they would eat virtually any creature they could
                                        catch, including armadillos, skunks, rats, lizards, frogs, and grasshoppers.
                                        Buffalo meat and other game was prepared and cooked by the women. The
                                            women also gathered wild fruits, seeds, nuts, berries, roots, and
                                            tubers — including plums, grapes, juniper berries, persimmons,
                                        mulberries, acorns, pecans, wild onions, radishes, and the fruit of the prickly
                                        pear cactus. The Comanche also acquired maize, dried pumpkin, and tobacco
                                        through trade and raids. Most meats were roasted over a fire or boiled. To boil
                                        fresh or dried meat and vegetables, women dug a pit in the ground, which they
                                        lined with animal skins or buffalo stomach and filled with water to make a kind
                                        of cooking pot. They placed heated stones in the water until it boiled and had
                                        cooked their stew. After they came into contact with the Spanish, the Comanche
                                        traded for copper pots and iron kettles, which made cooking easier.
                                        
                                        
Women used berries and nuts, as well as honey and tallow, to flavor buffalo
                                        meat. They stored the tallow in intestine casings or rawhide pouches called
                                        oyóotû¿. They especially liked to make a sweet mush of buffalo marrow mixed with
                                        crushed mesquite beans.
                                        
                                        
The Comanches sometimes ate raw meat, especially raw liver flavored with
                                        gall. They also drank the milk from the slashed udders of buffalo, deer,
                                            and elk.  Among their delicacies was the curdled milk from the
                                        stomachs of suckling buffalo calves. They also enjoyed buffalo tripe, or
                                        stomachs.
                                        
                                        
Comanche people generally had a light meal in the morning and a large
                                        evening meal. During the day they ate whenever they were hungry or when it was
                                        convenient. Like other Plains Indians, the Comanche were very hospitable people.
                                        They prepared meals whenever a visitor arrived in camp, which led to outsiders'
                                        belief that the Comanches ate at all hours of the day or night. Before calling a
                                        public event, the chief took a morsel of food, held it to the sky, and then
                                        buried it as a peace offering to the Great Spirit. Many families offered thanks
                                        as they sat down to eat their meals in their tipis.
                                        
                                        
Comanche children ate pemmican, but this was primarily a tasty, high-energy
                                        food reserved for war parties. Carried in a parfleche pouch, pemmican was eaten
                                        only when the men did not have time to hunt. Similarly, in camp, people ate
                                        pemmican only when other food was scarce. Traders ate pemmican sliced and dipped
                                        in honey, which they called Indian bread.
This is just one example, far
                                        away from the diets now routinely consumed with the 600,000 choices in modern
                                        supermarkets
                                    
No and yes. No, because we have
                                        modules that assist you with tracking and measuring progress. You can partner
                                        with a buddie or contact a health care professional to monitor and work with
                                        you. The meals have a shopping list and easy to follow recipe or video.
                                        
                                        
The "yes" is due to fast food, sweets, crisps, biscuits and the like being
                                        so tempting and everywhere. It is essential to understand your why for adopting
                                        the programme. Standard dietary lifestyles add fat and increase sickness. 
                                        Others around you may not support your choice accidentally; they will continue
                                        to eat the tempting junk foods.  The junk will still be in the cupboards,
                                        at every fuel station, work.  Your "why" has to be stronger than the
                                        obstacles to success. 
                                    
The best way to not do a life changing ketogenic diet is to mix in the foods and drinks which made you look to dieting in the first place. There are over 600,000 supermarket foods worldwide. Try to picture how many food items there were circa 150 years ago in every society. The modern foods have been designed to hit the "bliss point". Bad fats (vegetable or more accurately labeled seed oils) when mixed with flour and sugar create many of the treats in societies. These are toxic and correlate with many modern diseases.
Cholesterol is in every cell in your
                                        body. Do you believe your body would be trying to harm you? In order for vitamin
                                        D from sunlight to be synthesised, adequate cholesterol within the body is
                                        required. Did you know that more persons die with so called normal cholesterol
                                        than high - where does this fact leave the push to lower cholesterol.
                                        Cholesterol is required for male and female sex hormones. Cholesterol repairs
                                        the body and is required for a strong immune response.  Your brain has 25%
                                        of the cholesterol in your body, is it wise to tamper with our evolutionary
                                        workings on the hypothesis that is still an hypothesis, where the author has
                                        been proved to misrepresented facts.
                                        
The "Diet Heart Hypothesis" was developed in the 1950's by Ancel Keys, this
                                        blamed fat and cholesterol for heart attacks and strokes; whilst there is a
                                        consensus among many in favour of the theory, there is no definitive proof that
                                        cholesterol is a bad actor. Would we say someone should be drained of blood if
                                        they contracted blood cancer?  There are tests which can see heart disease
                                        such as a coronary artery calcium (cac) scan rather than a guess (framingham)
                                        which is current standard of care. When the standard of care equation is
                                        compared to cac results in the same individuals it is embarassing the
                                        difference; we cannot keep giving our populations statins on this
                                        basis.
Advocates of the diet heart hypothesis cannot reconcile that post
                                        menopausal women show significant benefit to having high cholesterol. Everyone,
                                        especially women would do well to read or listen to the "Big Fat Surprise" by Nina Teicholz,
                                        and review the YouTube works of Dave Feldman and David Diamond.
Further reading /
                                        viewing:
Tamara Willner
Dr Jeffrey Gerber
Dr Malcolm Kendrick
Dr Paul
                                            Mason
                                    
Dr Paul Mason
Dr Zoe Harcombe
Dr Assem Malhotra
Dr David Diamond
 
                        
                                In 1958 he launched the Seven Countries Study, researching the relationship between
                                dietary patterns and the prevalence of coronary heart disease in countries such as
                                Greece, Italy, Spain, South Africa, Japan, and Finland. This flawed study was to have
                                the most profound impact on dietary guidelines to this day.  Keys had
                                concluded that saturated fats as found in milk and meat have adverse effects, while
                                unsaturated fats found in vegetable oils had beneficial effects, largely by the
                                hypothesis that all dietary fats cause obesity and cancer.
Keys missed
                                    out 14 countries which inconvenienced his findings, such as Germany and
                                    France.
This hypothesis morphed from total cholesterol being an
                                issue to "LDL-c", and fat in general to "Saturated Fat".  This led to the billion
                                dollar statins industry, the demonisation of red meat and dairy to the benefit of low
                                fat, high carb food-like items.
Read more..
Is a senior software engineer and
                                entrepreneur.
                                
                                
Began a Low Carb, High Fat diet in April 2015 due to pre-diabetes.  His
                                cholesterol lipid numbers spiked substantially after going on the diet. Dave spotted a
                                pattern in the lipid system that’s very similar to distributed objects in
                                networks.
Dave has been able to show that by manipulating his diet
                                (for 3 days) he can make a mockery of the foundations
                                of the Diet Heart Hypothesis "Feldman Protocol".
Dave has also downloaded the
                                largest publicly available Nhanes dataset, with detailed information collated by the
                                Americans in most aspects of cholesterol.  The takeaway is that more people die
                                with so called lower normal cholesterol (LDL-c)
  . Read more..
                            
                                An advanced problem solving leader.
Similar to Dave Feldman, Ivor had some
                                metabolic issues to address after health tests.  Ivor used his engineering logic to
                                root cause and fix the issues his doctor was struggling with in the context of the
                                current dogmas.
Ivor's mentor David Bobbet, a millionaire Irish businessman, had
                                aced most health tests including those for diabetes.  It transpired that David had
                                excessive plaques within his arteries, not picked up by the regular cholesterol
                                tests.  A Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan looks within the arteries and saw the
                                disease, compared to the standard used (Framingham equation, which assists in dishing
                                out statins).
He has additionally highlighted the risk factors that were present
                                in a univariate and multivariate study of
                                second heart attacks following persons for years after the first attack.  The
                                results were Univariate Risk Ratio:
- Hypertension history
                                1.9x  (Highly significant)
- Diastolic BP > 80 )mm Hg) 1.6x (Highly
                                significant)
Total Cholesterol > 200 mg/dl 1.5x (borderline significant)
LDL
                                > 130 mg/dl 1.4x (non-significant)
Multivariate Risk
                                    Ratio:
Total Cholesterol ~1x (non-significant)
LDL
                                ~1x (non-significant)
Insulin 6.7x (Highly
                                significant)
 Read more..
Abstract
                                        
Objective It is well known that total cholesterol becomes less of a
                                        risk factor or not at all for all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality with
                                        increasing age, but as little is known as to whether low-density lipoprotein
                                        cholesterol (LDL-C), one component of total cholesterol, is associated with
                                        mortality in the elderly, we decided to investigate this issue.
                                        
                                        
Setting, participants and outcome measures We sought PubMed for cohort
                                        studies, where LDL-C had been investigated as a risk factor for all-cause and/or
                                        CV mortality in individuals ≥60 years from the general population.
                                        
                                        
Results We identified 19 cohort studies including 30 cohorts with a total of
                                        68 094 elderly people, where all-cause mortality was recorded in 28 cohorts and
                                        CV mortality in 9 cohorts. Inverse association between all-cause mortality and
                                        LDL-C was seen in 16 cohorts (in 14 with statistical significance) representing
                                        92% of the number of participants, where this association was recorded. In the
                                        rest, no association was found. In two cohorts, CV mortality was highest in the
                                        lowest LDL-C quartile and with statistical significance; in seven cohorts, no
                                        association was found.
                                        
                                        
Conclusions High LDL-C is inversely associated with mortality in most people
                                        over 60 years. This finding is inconsistent with the cholesterol hypothesis (ie,
                                        that cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, is inherently atherogenic). Since elderly
                                        people with high LDL-C live as long or longer than those with low LDL-C, our
                                        analysis provides reason to question the validity of the cholesterol hypothesis.
                                        Moreover, our study provides the rationale for a re-evaluation of guidelines
                                        recommending pharmacological reduction of LDL-C in the elderly as a component of
                                        cardiovascular disease prevention strategies.
                                    
"We have categorized statins for
                                        low-risk patients as red, or not recommended, based on certain value judgments.
                                        Statin studies, mostly industry sponsored, used methods such as run-out phases,
                                        and the raw trial data continue to be withheld by manufacturers despite many
                                        requests by independent groups. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the
                                        reported benefits represent a best-case, whereas harms are most likely
                                        underestimated. In addition, although statin-induced muscle symptoms are at
                                        least five times more likely than any benefit, this is typically reversible. The
                                        decision not to categorize statins for low-risk patients as black, or harms
                                        greater than benefits, is based on value judgments about this compared with
                                        cardiovascular events. This decision becomes trickier when considering the
                                        additional burden of statin-induced diabetes. One large, high-quality trial did
                                        not find an increase in diabetes risk. However, originally unpublished results
                                        from the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial
                                        failed to disclose that the NNH for new-onset diabetes was just 38 in patients
                                        treated with atorvastatin (Lipitor), 80 mg, compared with placebo."
"...unless LDL levels are very high (7.8 mmol/L or higher), they have no value, in isolation, in predicting those individuals at risks of CHD"
They don't measure LDL-c. They tend to review Cholesterol/HDL ratio, where cholesterol is the total number. E.g. https://qrisk.org/three/
This trial was meant to show that
                                        reducing Saturated Fat, Cholesterol amongst other areas would reduce Coronary
                                        Heart Disease (CHD) - it did'nt show the intended results.
                                        
                                        
(https://www.crossfit.com/essentials/multiple-risk-factor-intervention-trial-risk-factor-changes-and-mortality-results)
                                        
MRFIT, published in 1982, randomized 12,866 high-risk men (men who smoked or
                                        had high cholesterol or blood pressure, but who had not previously had a heart
                                        attack) to a complex intervention or control. The “special intervention” for the
                                        former group included (1) cessation of cigarette smoking, (2) weight loss, (3)
                                        hypertensive medication, and (4) nutritional counseling, with a focus on
                                        reducing saturated fat and cholesterol intake. Controls were given no special
                                        treatment. Subjects were followed for an average of seven years.
                                        
                                        
The intervention was successful in achieving its targets. The special
                                        intervention (SI) group saw greater decreases in blood pressure, serum
                                        cholesterol, and smoking rates over the course of six annual visits, compared to
                                        usual care (UC) controls. The groups were well-matched at baseline, and by year
                                        six, the SI group’s mean DBP was 3 mm Hg lower, serum cholesterol 5 mg/dL lower
                                        (entirely accounted for by an LDL decrease), and smoking rates 13% lower (32% vs
                                        45%).
                                        
                                        
The primary outcome, however, was CHD mortality, and here the trial failed
                                        to show an impact. Over six years, there were 92 CHD deaths in the SI group (out
                                        of 6,428 initial participants) and 104 in the UC group (from 6,438
                                        participants)—an improvement in mortality that did not reach statistical
                                        significance. The difference in all-cause mortality was even smaller, with 265
                                        deaths in the SI group and 260 in the UC. It may be worth noting that the single
                                        largest difference between the groups in terms of mortality by a specific cause
                                        was related to deaths due to cancer, which numbered 81 in the SI group and 69 in
                                        UC.
                                        
                                        
Overall, this trial failed to demonstrate that lowering cholesterol (via
                                        reduction in cholesterol and saturated fat intake), ceasing smoking, and
                                        normalizing blood pressure together significantly decreases heart disease risk
                                        in high-risk men, and the combinatorial therapy makes it impossible to discern
                                        the positive (or even negative, as in the case of drug-based blood pressure
                                        lowering) impact of each treatment element individually.
                                    
The low fat aspect of the diet
                                        showed again that lowering cholesterol had no impact on heart disease:
                                        
                                        
(https://thebms.org.uk/2006/04/womens-health-initiative-the-final-outcome/):
                                        
A low fat diet was hypothesized to reduce the risk of breast and colorectal
                                        cancer and cardiovascular disease [5,6,7]. 19, 541 women were assigned to a diet
                                        with reduced total fat intake (20% total energy) and increased intakes of
                                        vegetables, fruits, and grains. The comparison group of 29, 294 women did not
                                        have any dietary changes. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years. The dietary intervention
                                        did not significantly reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke,
                                        cardiovascular disease, breast or colorectal cancer.
                                        
                                        
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Health_Initiative):
                                        
Dietary modification
                                        
The dietary modification (DM) trial was conducted with the purpose of
                                        identifying the effects of a low-fat eating pattern; the primary outcome
                                        measures were the incidence of invasive breast and colorectal cancers, fatal and
                                        nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and overall cardiovascular
                                        disease (CVD), calculated as a composite of CHD and stroke.
                                        
                                        
Women in the trial were randomly assigned to the dietary intervention group
                                        (40%; n = 19541) or the control group (60%; n = 29294). In addition to the
                                        global exclusion criteria, component-specific exclusion criteria included prior
                                        breast cancer, colorectal cancer, other cancers excluding nonmelanoma skin
                                        cancer in the past 10 years, adherence or retention concerns (e.g., a substance
                                        abuse history or dementia), or a baseline diet that included a fat intake
                                        accounting for less than 32% of total energy intake.
                                        
                                        
Participants in the intervention group underwent a regimen of trainings,
                                        group meetings, and consultations which encouraged low-fat eating habits,
                                        targeted to 20% of daily caloric intake, along with increasing the consumption
                                        of fruits, vegetables, and grains. Those assigned to the control group were not
                                        asked to adopt any specific dietary changes.
                                        
                                        
DM component findings
                                        
The mean follow-up for the DM intervention was 8.1 years. At study years 1
                                        and 6, the dietary fat intake levels for the intervention group were 10.7% and
                                        8.2% less than those of the control group, respectively. The results indicated
                                        that, despite some reduction in CVD risk factors (e.g., blood lipids and
                                        diastolic blood pressure), there was no significant reduction in the risk of
                                        CHD, stroke, or CVD, indicating that a more focused combination of diet and
                                        lifestyle interventions may be required to further improve CVD risk factors and
                                        reduce overall risk. In addition, no statistically significant reduction in
                                        breast cancer risk was identified, although the results approached significance
                                        and indicated that longer-term follow-up may yield a more definitive comparison.
                                        The trial also did not identify a reduction in colorectal cancer risk
                                        attributable to a low-fat dietary pattern.
Other Assessments
                                            (https://www.reddit.com/r/ScientificNutrition/comments/d1vdrx/lowfat_dietary_pattern_among_postmenopausal_women/):
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2006/02/09/low-fat-diet-not-a-cure-all-womens-health-initiative/
                                        
                                        
The results, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
                                        showed no benefits for a low-fat diet. Women assigned to this eating strategy
                                        did not appear to gain protection against breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or
                                        cardiovascular disease. And after eight years, their weights were generally the
                                        same as those of women following their usual diets.
                                        
                                        
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467232?dopt=Citation
                                        
                                        
a low-fat dietary pattern did not result in a statistically significant
                                        reduction in invasive breast cancer risk over an 8.1-year average follow-up
                                        period.
                                        
                                        
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467233?dopt=Citation
                                        
                                        
In this study, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention did not reduce the
                                        risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women during 8.1 years of follow-up.
                                        
                                        
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467234?dopt=Citation
                                        
                                        
a dietary intervention that reduced total fat intake and increased intakes
                                        of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not significantly reduce the risk of CHD,
                                        stroke, or CVD
                                    
BBC
Dr Zyrowski
                            Brian Sanders
Please watch and see if this makes sense.  You already know
                        through your life experience, maybe politics or work, that the truth sometimes doesn't
                        matter.  Did you know for example that most Type 2 diabetics who put their condition into
                        remission are meat eaters, well over 90%.  How does this sit with the claims from the plant
                        based pushers that meat causes diabetes?  For each plant based film, such as what the
                        health or cow spiracy, fact check these by searching YouTube with the word "debunk".
                                Do you remember the diesel fuel debacle or how about tabacco or what is live right now,
                                sugar.  What these all have in common is that the "anointed" authorities have tried
                                to make these problems seem like there is nothing to see
                                here.
There is an element within the climate change movement
                                that has sneakily bolted onto this great agenda a notion that cows are bad for the
                                environment. "We" have proof that cows raised in a holistic manner can and do become not
                                just carbon neutral, but that they positively sequester carbon.  Keywords for your
                                research are the Savory Institute, White Oak Pastures (they have verification of
                                positive carbon sequestration), Joel Salitin, Frank Mitloehner to be starting
                                with.  Once you hear and see this side you the lie will be
                                uncovered.
Soil health is superior with holistic management
                                using animals.  For Type 2 Diabetics who cannot tolerate carbs, meat, fish and
                                diary lower blood sugars into the "normal" range; this saves limbs, eyesight, strokes,
                                heart attacks, cancers etc.  Should they be denied up to 10 years of life due to
                                misinformation, politics and ideology?
                        Watch Game Changers on Netflix or Amazon. Then watch the alternative - someone telling
                        porkies.
Further opinion Zoe Harcombe
                            We respect peoples right to choose the dietary pattern they wish to live by.  We have
                            concerns for the children who do not have a choice.  The concern comes out of no Vegan
                            societies ever existing in the past or current, that we can reference tor health
                            outcomes.  Veganism is around 70 years old.  Also some quick YouTube research
                            shows the condition of some Vegans who are "not doing it right".  For a small minority
                            who can tolerate the sugar and carb load of a Vegan diet good for them; on American
                            statistics 88% of the population are metabolically ill with 50% diabetic or pre-diabetic -
                            not a good match for a high carb Vegan diet.  The prominent Peta activist and Vegan, Dr
                            Neal Barnard's diabetes results (a randomised clincal trial, which is the gold standard)
                            produces results inferior to every Dr who practices low carb / ketogenic medicine, by a
                            sizable margin.  How can you fix a sugar intolerance condition with a diet that is high
                            in sugar (carbs)?
When Moyle
                                Baker was reversing his Type 2, he was able to just get into the diabetes remission
                            numbers (HbA1c of 41) when eating a plant based diet with lots of roasted vegetables, green
                            smoothies and reducing meat with stacks of exercise.  No matter how much exercise he
                            did 41 was the lowest possible.  Switching to more meat, fish and dairy yielded HbA1c's
                            of between 35 and 38 (original 143), strength and muscle improvements beyond Moyle's
                            expectations.  Similar diabetes results are seen with low carbers / ketogentic and or
                            carnivore advocates. 
 
                        I am here to help and assist with your fat loss and or condition
 
                        Technical support and have had my diabetes reversed by Katie
 
                    Create a website - Get now